According to a survey of 1,000 US workers conducted by Resume Genius, 90 percent of respondents said they would admit a mistake to their manager, while 69 percent said they would openly share mistakes with coworkers. At the same time, 22 percent reported they would be likely to shift blame if an important project failed, and 38 percent said they sometimes hesitate to speak up because they fear judgment from others.
Although the survey was not specific to laboratory professionals, the findings highlight workplace dynamics that can have significant consequences in laboratory settings, where errors, near misses, and quality issues must be identified and addressed quickly.
Psychological safety and laboratory error reporting
Psychological safety refers to an environment in which employees feel comfortable raising concerns, asking questions, and admitting mistakes without fear of punishment or embarrassment. For laboratories, that culture can directly influence how effectively teams identify and resolve problems before they affect safety, compliance, or research outcomes.
Many laboratories already rely on formal systems for documenting deviations, corrective and preventive actions (CAPA), incident reports, and quality investigations. However, those systems are only effective when employees feel comfortable reporting issues in the first place.
The Resume Genius survey suggests some workers may still be reluctant to share concerns openly. In addition to the 38 percent who reported hesitating to speak up due to fear of judgment, 46 percent said they avoid giving critical feedback because they do not want to upset others.
In a laboratory environment, hesitation can create challenges when employees observe:
- Safety concerns
- Procedural deviations
- Equipment performance issues
- Data discrepancies
- Quality control failures
Addressing these issues early often reduces the risk of larger operational problems later.
Why employees may stay silent
The survey also found that many workers feel pressure to present a professional image. More than half of respondents reported avoiding showing weaknesses at work, while nearly half said they maintain a workplace persona that differs from their authentic personality. These findings underscore the importance of creating environments where employees can acknowledge uncertainty and ask for help when needed.
Scientific work frequently involves troubleshooting unexpected results, learning new techniques, and identifying errors before they affect downstream processes. Teams that view mistakes as opportunities for learning may be better positioned to address problems quickly than teams where employees fear criticism or blame.
Supporting data integrity and quality culture
Data integrity depends on accurate reporting, transparent documentation, and timely communication, all of which can be compromised when employees feel uncomfortable raising concerns or discussing mistakes. In laboratory environments, where quality systems rely on accurate information and timely issue escalation, a culture that discourages open communication can make it more difficult to identify and address problems before they affect operations, compliance, or research outcomes.
Laboratory managers can help strengthen psychological safety by encouraging questions, recognizing employees who identify potential issues, and approaching investigations with a focus on understanding root causes rather than assigning blame. While accountability remains an important component of quality management, many experts argue that lasting improvement comes from examining why errors occur and identifying opportunities to strengthen processes, training, and systems to reduce future risk.
Lab Management Certificate
The Lab Management certificate is more than training—it’s a professional advantage.
Gain critical skills and IACET-approved CEUs that make a measurable difference.
What the survey means for laboratory leaders
The Resume Genius findings suggest that many workers continue to struggle with concerns about judgment, criticism, and workplace perceptions. These challenges can affect far more than employee satisfaction, influencing whether employees feel comfortable reporting errors, raising quality concerns, or identifying potential risks before they escalate into larger operational issues.
A workplace culture that encourages open communication may improve safety reporting, strengthen quality systems, support data integrity, and help laboratories identify operational risks before they become larger problems. When employees trust that concerns will be addressed constructively rather than met with blame, organizations may be better positioned to detect trends, investigate root causes, and implement meaningful corrective actions.
With regulatory requirements growing more complex and quality expectations continuing to rise, creating an environment where employees feel comfortable speaking up may be just as important as the systems designed to capture the information they share. Formal reporting processes remain essential, but their effectiveness ultimately depends on whether employees are willing to use them consistently and honestly. By fostering psychological safety alongside strong quality management practices, laboratory leaders can help ensure that critical information reaches decision-makers in time to protect safety, maintain compliance, and support reliable scientific outcomes.
This article was created with the assistance of Generative AI and has undergone editorial review before publishing.
