Synthetic Cell System Integrates Growth, Genome Replication, and Division

University of Minnesota researchers assembled a chemically defined cell-like system that combines several functions associated with living cells

Written byMichelle Gaulin
| 2 min read
Synthetic cells in a dark background, representing SpudCell technology.
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00

Researchers at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities have developed a chemically defined synthetic cell system that can acquire resources, grow, replicate its genome, and divide. The cell-like system, called SpudCell, brings together functions that synthetic biologists have previously struggled to integrate within a single platform.

The researchers described SpudCell in a bioRxiv preprint. The study has not undergone peer review, and the system remains far from a self-sustaining living cell. However, integrating several life-like processes within a single chemically defined system represents an important advance for bottom-up synthetic biology.

Building a cell from nonliving components

Rather than modifying or simplifying an existing organism, the team assembled SpudCell from purified, nonliving components, including DNA, enzymes, ribosomes, and a lipid membrane. Its 90-kilobase genome is distributed across seven DNA plasmids that encode functions related to resource uptake, protein production, genome replication, growth, and division.

SpudCell receives resources by fusing with smaller lipid vesicles containing enzymes, ribosomes, and other materials. Genes within the synthetic cell direct the production of molecular tags that allow these feeder vesicles to attach to and merge with its membrane. This process supplies the materials the system needs to grow and copy its genome.

The researchers also developed a genetically encoded mechanism for division. Surface proteins accumulate on the membrane and interact with an added molecule, creating forces that can split the lipid compartment. This approach avoids the cytoskeleton-based machinery natural cells typically use to divide.

“This is likely the most exciting project I’ve ever worked on,” said Kate Adamala, associate professor in the University of Minnesota College of Biological Sciences. “We’ve replicated in chemistry what only used to be possible in biology: the complete set of behaviors of a cell.”

Selection without autonomous evolution

The researchers introduced a mutation that caused some SpudCells to produce more of the protein that captures feeder vesicles. Those variants acquired more resources, grew faster, and became more prevalent during repeated growth and division cycles.

The experiment demonstrated competition and selection within the system, but it did not represent autonomous Darwinian evolution. Researchers inserted the mutation themselves, and repeated division required mechanical assistance.

SpudCell also does not distribute its replicated DNA reliably between daughter compartments. After five division cycles, only 30 percent of the resulting cells retained the full genome. Its ribosomes degrade over time, and the system cannot produce replacements or independently remove damaged components.

A need for reproducible synthetic cell workflows

The project also illustrates the operational barriers laboratories face when developing complex synthetic biology platforms. Adamala said collaborators needed in-person demonstrations to reproduce some of the techniques, highlighting the difficulty of transferring methods that depend heavily on tacit knowledge.

The team identified shared protocols, modular components, and standardized synthetic cell platforms as priorities for future development. The researchers are also involved in Biotic, a public-benefit research organization intended to coordinate synthetic cell engineering and support open technical infrastructure.

For laboratories working in synthetic biology, the study demonstrates both the potential and the current fragility of bottom-up systems. Turning SpudCell into a reliable research or manufacturing platform will require more stable genome organization, improved division and inheritance, renewable molecular machinery, and workflows that laboratories can reproduce without extensive hands-on training.

“It’s inefficient, but you know exactly how it’s built,” Adamala said. That defined construction could allow researchers to improve individual components systematically, even as the system remains well short of a fully autonomous living cell.

This article was created with the assistance of Generative AI and has undergone editorial review before publishing.

Add Lab Manager as a preferred source on Google

Add Lab Manager as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  • What is SpudCell?

    SpudCell is a chemically defined synthetic cell system developed by researchers at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities. It can acquire resources, grow, replicate its genome, and divide, representing significant progress in synthetic biology.

  • How is SpudCell constructed?

    SpudCell is assembled from purified, nonliving components, which include DNA, enzymes, ribosomes, and a lipid membrane. Its genome is distributed across seven DNA plasmids that fulfill various cellular functions.

  • What are the limitations of SpudCell?

    Although SpudCell exhibits several cell-like functions, it is not a fully autonomous living cell. It does not reliably distribute its replicated DNA between daughter compartments, and after multiple division cycles, many cells fail to retain the complete genome.

  • Can SpudCell evolve autonomously?

    No, SpudCell cannot undergo autonomous Darwinian evolution. While the researchers demonstrated competition within the system by introducing a mutation, repeated division required mechanical assistance.

  • What challenges exist for synthetic biology laboratories using systems like SpudCell?

    Synthetic biology laboratories face operational barriers when developing complex platforms like SpudCell, including the need for reproducible workflows that do not rely on extensive hands-on training and the development of standardized protocols and components.

About the Author

  • Headshot photo of Michelle Gaulin

    Michelle Gaulin is an associate editor for Lab Manager. She holds a bachelor of journalism degree from Toronto Metropolitan University in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and has two decades of experience in editorial writing, content creation, and brand storytelling. In her role, she contributes to the production of the magazine’s print and online content, collaborates with industry experts, and works closely with freelance writers to deliver high-quality, engaging material.

    Her professional background spans multiple industries, including automotive, travel, finance, publishing, and technology. She specializes in simplifying complex topics and crafting compelling narratives that connect with both B2B and B2C audiences.

    In her spare time, Michelle enjoys outdoor activities and cherishes time with her daughter. She can be reached at mgaulin@labmanager.com.

    View Full Profile

Related Topics

Loading Next Article...
Loading Next Article...
Current Magazine Issue Background Image

CURRENT ISSUE - July/August 2026

Treat Equipment Like a Strategy Not a Purchase

From Procurement to Retirement, Every Instrument Decision Shapes Lab Performance, Resilience, and Cost Control

Lab Manager July/August 2026 Cover Image