Technology Labs Fall Behind Offices in Utilization Tracking

JLL benchmarking data shows that many organizations lack visibility into how specialized spaces and critical assets are being used

Written byMichelle Gaulin
| 2 min read
Technical space in a laboratory with researchers focused on tasks
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00

Technology companies are expanding specialized laboratory infrastructure to support artificial intelligence, hardware development, semiconductor research, and other advanced technologies, but many lack the utilization data needed to plan and manage those spaces effectively.

New benchmarking data from commercial real estate services firm JLL shows that 91 percent of surveyed technology companies track office utilization, while only 32 percent monitor utilization in technical spaces. Just 17 percent track the use of critical assets such as IT racks and workstations.

The gap can make it difficult for organizations to identify capacity constraints, underused areas, or opportunities to reconfigure space before approving new construction, renovations, or equipment purchases.

Technical spaces require different metrics

Technology laboratories account for 13.9 million square feet within JLL’s occupancy planning and management portfolio, representing 13 percent of the total managed area. JLL identified five broad laboratory categories with distinct infrastructure needs: artificial intelligence and machine learning labs, hardware and equipment labs, semiconductor design and R&D facilities, quantum computing facilities, and game development labs.

Unlike offices, where organizations often measure attendance or workstation occupancy, laboratories revolve around equipment, infrastructure, and workflows. An unoccupied laboratory bench does not necessarily indicate unused capacity if equipment is running unattended, undergoing maintenance, or supporting work elsewhere in the facility. Utilization assessments therefore need to account for both physical space and the assets housed within it.

Infrastructure and replacement cycles also vary substantially among laboratory types. JLL reported that artificial intelligence and machine learning labs can face computing hardware refresh cycles of two to three years. Quantum computing facilities, by comparison, require specialized infrastructure with high upfront costs, long lead times, and limited flexibility once installed.

Interest in technical-space data is increasing

JLL’s broader 2026 Global Occupancy Planning Benchmark Report drew from 84 organizations representing 716 million square feet across several global regions. The report defines technical spaces broadly to include laboratories, manufacturing and distribution facilities, warehouses, data centers, secure facilities, and other specialized environments.

Participation in technical-space utilization tracking increased from five percent to 26 percent over one year, according to the report. Across 51 accounts supported by JLL Occupancy Planning & Management, technical spaces represented nearly 23 percent of all managed space. Respondents reported actual technical-space utilization of 45 percent against a target of 72 percent.

Because those figures combine several types of technical environments, they should not be interpreted as laboratory-only utilization rates. However, the data indicates growing interest in applying more formal occupancy and asset-management practices beyond traditional office space.

What the findings mean for lab managers

For lab managers, the findings highlight the importance of defining what utilization means before collecting data. Useful measures might include instrument operating time, booking patterns, workflow bottlenecks, maintenance downtime, environmental requirements, and demand during peak periods, rather than relying solely on room occupancy.

JLL also expects future technology laboratories to incorporate more automation, robotics, and sensor-based monitoring. Those systems can affect equipment footprints, maintenance clearances, utility demands, data infrastructure, and cooling requirements. Planning for those needs during the design stage can reduce the need for later modifications, according to the firm.

The report reflects JLL’s portfolio and survey participants rather than the laboratory sector as a whole. Even so, the findings underscore the value of reliable utilization data when organizations make decisions about laboratory space, equipment, and infrastructure.

This article was created with the assistance of Generative AI and has undergone editorial review before publishing.

Add Lab Manager as a preferred source on Google

Add Lab Manager as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  • What is laboratory space utilization?

    Laboratory space utilization refers to how effectively laboratory environments are used, including the measurement of both physical space and the utilization of equipment and workflows within that space.

  • Why is tracking technical space utilization important for technology companies?

    Tracking technical space utilization helps companies identify capacity constraints, underused areas, and opportunities for reconfiguration, which can inform decisions about new construction, renovations, or equipment purchases.

  • What kind of metrics should be used to measure laboratory space utilization?

    Useful metrics include instrument operating time, booking patterns, workflow bottlenecks, maintenance downtime, and environmental requirements, instead of solely relying on room occupancy.

  • How do different laboratory types affect infrastructure needs and utilization tracking?

    Different laboratory types have varying infrastructure requirements and refresh cycles, affecting how utilization is tracked and the metrics used to assess their effectiveness. For example, AI labs may need hardware refreshes every two to three years, while quantum computing facilities require specialized and costly installations.

  • What trends are emerging in the management of laboratory facilities?

    There is an increasing interest in applying formal occupancy and asset-management practices in technical spaces, with more organizations focusing on effective data collection and management strategies for laboratory space.

About the Author

  • Headshot photo of Michelle Gaulin

    Michelle Gaulin is an associate editor for Lab Manager. She holds a bachelor of journalism degree from Toronto Metropolitan University in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and has two decades of experience in editorial writing, content creation, and brand storytelling. In her role, she contributes to the production of the magazine’s print and online content, collaborates with industry experts, and works closely with freelance writers to deliver high-quality, engaging material.

    Her professional background spans multiple industries, including automotive, travel, finance, publishing, and technology. She specializes in simplifying complex topics and crafting compelling narratives that connect with both B2B and B2C audiences.

    In her spare time, Michelle enjoys outdoor activities and cherishes time with her daughter. She can be reached at mgaulin@labmanager.com.

    View Full Profile

Related Topics

Loading Next Article...
Loading Next Article...
Current Magazine Issue Background Image

CURRENT ISSUE - July/August 2026

Treat Equipment Like a Strategy Not a Purchase

From Procurement to Retirement, Every Instrument Decision Shapes Lab Performance, Resilience, and Cost Control

Lab Manager July/August 2026 Cover Image