Two Experimental Methods Target PFAS Destruction in Water

Researchers used cold atmospheric plasma and hydrodynamic cavitation to degrade PFOS, but scale-up and byproduct analysis remain challenges

Written byMichelle Gaulin
| 2 min read
Experimental setup showing cold atmospheric plasma treatment in water
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00

Researchers in Germany have developed two experimental treatment methods designed to break down per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, in contaminated water rather than simply separating the chemicals into another waste stream.

Teams at Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf tested cold atmospheric plasma and hydrodynamic cavitation against perfluorooctane sulfonate, or PFOS, a persistent and extensively studied member of the PFAS family. The researchers reported the results in Scientific Reports and Chemical Engineering Journal Advances. Analytical teams at the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research helped measure PFAS degradation, transformation products, and fluoride released during treatment.

Many conventional treatment methods, including activated carbon, ion-exchange resins, and membrane filtration, capture PFAS but do not destroy their carbon–fluorine bonds. These approaches can generate concentrated materials that require additional treatment or disposal.

Plasma concentrates PFOS at a reactive interface

In the Scientific Reports study, researchers generated cold atmospheric plasma above PFOS-contaminated tap water while injecting air through the liquid. PFOS molecules accumulated at the surfaces of the rising bubbles, which transported the contaminants toward the plasma–liquid interface.

The plasma produced reactive oxidative and reductive species that contributed to PFOS degradation. Gas dispersion also increased mixing and expanded the interfacial area where the reactions occurred. Under the study’s best-performing conditions, the system degraded 99.99 percent of the measured PFOS and followed apparent first-order kinetics with a half-life of 1.6 minutes.

However, PFOS disappearance did not represent complete destruction of all fluorinated material. The researchers measured about 35 percent defluorination, meaning that much of the fluorine originally bound to the PFOS was not recovered as inorganic fluoride. The team identified several shorter-chain transformation products, but incomplete fluorine recovery suggests that additional compounds may have entered the gas or foam phases, adhered to reactor surfaces, or remained undetected.

The researchers conducted the experiments using PFOS at an initial concentration of 5 mg/L in volumes ranging from 10 to 40 milliliters. They selected the elevated concentration to support reliable detection and kinetic analysis, but environmental PFOS concentrations can be considerably lower.

Cavitation uses collapsing bubbles

The second method forced PFOS-contaminated water through a narrow opening at high pressure, producing vapor bubbles that later collapsed as the surrounding pressure increased. PFOS accumulated on the bubble surfaces and experienced localized heat, pressure, and reactive species during collapse.

The hydrodynamic cavitation system degraded approximately 37 percent of the dissolved PFOS during the reported experiments. The researchers are working to raise degradation above 80 percent and mineralize more than half of the chemically bound fluorine.

Scale-up and analytical questions remain

The plasma method produced faster degradation than cavitation but required more energy per unit of water. The researchers are now increasing the treatment volume from approximately 50 milliliters to five liters and exploring whether a combined system could pair the rapid reactions of plasma with the effects of cavitation.

For laboratories evaluating PFAS destruction technologies, the research highlights the importance of measuring more than the loss of the original target compound. Complete assessments will require fluoride mass balances, identification of liquid and gaseous transformation products, tests at environmentally relevant concentrations, and verification that treatment does not replace one persistent contaminant with another. The current findings remain laboratory-scale results rather than evidence of a commercially ready water-treatment system.

This article was created with the assistance of Generative AI and has undergone editorial review before publishing.

Add Lab Manager as a preferred source on Google

Add Lab Manager as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

About the Author

  • Headshot photo of Michelle Gaulin

    Michelle Gaulin is an associate editor for Lab Manager. She holds a bachelor of journalism degree from Toronto Metropolitan University in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and has two decades of experience in editorial writing, content creation, and brand storytelling. In her role, she contributes to the production of the magazine’s print and online content, collaborates with industry experts, and works closely with freelance writers to deliver high-quality, engaging material.

    Her professional background spans multiple industries, including automotive, travel, finance, publishing, and technology. She specializes in simplifying complex topics and crafting compelling narratives that connect with both B2B and B2C audiences.

    In her spare time, Michelle enjoys outdoor activities and cherishes time with her daughter. She can be reached at mgaulin@labmanager.com.

    View Full Profile

Related Topics

Loading Next Article...
Loading Next Article...
Current Magazine Issue Background Image

CURRENT ISSUE - July/August 2026

Treat Equipment Like a Strategy Not a Purchase

From Procurement to Retirement, Every Instrument Decision Shapes Lab Performance, Resilience, and Cost Control

Lab Manager July/August 2026 Cover Image