Bacterial Slime: It's what's for Dinner

If it were the end of the world as we know it, we’d be fine, according to Michigan Technological University professor Joshua Pearce.

Written byMichigan Technological University
| 3 min read
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
3:00

“People have been doing catastrophic risk research for a while,” says Pearce. “But most of what’s been done is dark, apocalyptic and dismal. It hasn’t provided any real solutions.”

Even when looking at doomsday scenarios—like super-volcanoes, abrupt climate change and nuclear winter—society’s forecast isn’t horrific. In fact, Pearce says life will still have a sunny outlook. His research is outlined in a new book, Feeding Everyone No Matter What, out this week.

Survivalist Solution

“We researched the worst cases and asked, ‘is it possible to still feed everybody after a complete collapse of the agricultural system?’” he says. “All solutions until this book focused on food storage, the survivalist method of putting cans in closets. But for global catastrophes, you’d need at least five years of supplies—think bedroom size, not just a closet.”

To continue reading this article, sign up for FREE to
Lab Manager Logo
Membership is FREE and provides you with instant access to eNewsletters, digital publications, article archives, and more.

CURRENT ISSUE - October 2025

Turning Safety Principles Into Daily Practice

Move Beyond Policies to Build a Lab Culture Where Safety is Second Nature

Lab Manager October 2025 Cover Image