Lab Manager | Run Your Lab Like a Business

A More Holistic Approach to Laboratory Resource Reduction

The environmental impact of labs is nothing short of significant

by Sara Goudarzi
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify

Laboratories consume more energy and resources than do spaces such as offices or classrooms. To put it concretely, a lab uses about five times the amount of energy, and at least four times the amount of water, of a typical office space. Then there’s the waste: In 2014, it was estimated that labs worldwide discard about 12 billion pounds in plastic alone. Add to that hazardous waste the gloves and all the other disposable items that are tossed out daily plus the energy used by the equipment and appliances, and it’s clear that the environmental impact of labs is nothing short of significant.

As our energy use increases and our environmental footprint becomes more quantifiable, an increasing number of organizations look for solutions to reduce their resource usage. And while many such initiatives are easily adopted in office-type spaces, they tend to be more intimidating to those who work in lab environments.

Get training in Metrics and Productivity and earn CEUs.One of over 25 IACET-accredited courses in the Academy.
Metrics and Productivity Course

“For a lot of people, it’s a little bit daunting because people aren’t comfortable with the procedures and things that happen in a laboratory,” says Allison Paradise, executive director of My Green Lab, a nonprofit in California that aids laboratories with resource reduction initiatives.

Related Article: How Consumables Manufacturers Can Help Make Labs Greener

“So that’s why we find it so important to raise awareness about lab spaces and educate people that a lot of stuff that’s happening in the lab is very analogous to what happens in your everyday life,” she adds. “You can make recommendations that are really easy for people to follow and that scientists can actually understand and get on board with. It's not nearly as complex as people think it is, but I think that complexity in their head can make people shy away from doing anything for a while.”

With the aid of organizations like My Green Lab, however, that attitude is starting to change. From making simple changes within existing structures to thinking about design before building a lab, more and more managers and those in charge are looking for ways to save resources and funds.

Simple changes

The Pasquinelli Lab at the University of California San Diego (UCSD) studies microRNA regulation using the model organism C. elegans, with current focuses on how regulation of the miRNA pathway plays a role in aging, heat stress, and polyadenylation length. In 2015, the UCSD Green Labs program along with My Green Lab approached the Pasquinelli Lab to participate in a sustainability program.

“I outright asked what sort of benefits there were for participating in this program, and the UCSD facilities member involved in the program mentioned that there might be opportunities to have older, nonefficient equipment replaced free of cost or with rebates for new green equipment, and it was also mentioned that in the future, UCSD Facilities was interested in retrofitting labs to use LED lighting,” says Ian Nicastro, Pasquinelli’s lab manager.

Nicastro jumped on the LED lighting upgrade offer and asked whether in exchange for his lab’s participation in the Green Labs program, they could be the pilot lab for the LED lighting retrofitting. UCSD agreed.

As a first step, My Green Lab presented Nicastro with an online survey to gauge the level of sustainability practices already in place. Paradise and her colleague then toured the lab space and met with the entire staff and went through the results of the survey to highlight specific areas that they felt could be improved upon.

“These were very specifically tailored suggestions, for instance, acquiring outlet timers to use on our lab’s microscopy heating blocks and turning off hybridization ovens when not in use,” Nicastro explains.

This approach is what Paradise refers to as a holistic one, or one that encompasses thinking about environmental, social, and economic sustainability as opposed to focusing on just one aspect of sustainability.

Among My Green Lab’s key programs is the umbrella one, or green lab certification, where they ask labs such as Pasquinelli to essentially perform a self-assessment online and better understand what they’re already doing.

Related Article: The Scientist's Role in Laboratory Sustainability Efforts

“We ask a lot of questions—things like do you turn off your equipment at night and do you turn off the lights and have you installed aerators on your faucets,” she says. “From there, we’ll sit down with the labs and help them understand where they can make improvements and, again, everything we’re recommending here is really easy, doesn’t cost any money or, if it costs money, it’s usually money that would be spent by an organization to support this—not the lab itself.”

Sustainability on the rise

Although there have been programs in place looking at more sustainable building design for at least 20 years, enterprises like My Green Lab are relatively new. When Paradise started the nonprofit some four and a half years ago, there were maybe 10 or 12 programs nationwide that addressed lab sustainability. Now, she says, there are upward of 60 such programs across the country. This means Paradise and others like her have been doing a good job of getting the word out. And with the news rapidly spreading, sustainability initiatives are becoming more widespread.

“The biggest trend I have noticed is that universities and companies are actively pursuing sustainability programs, especially ones that involve more than just recycling initiatives,” Nicastro says. “I’ve seen a lot of solar panels going up at the various institutes around the university here as well as on the university campus.”

For Bryan Cannon, design principal at HGA Architects and Engineers, some of the greatest challenges and most promising trends in green laboratory initiatives have to do with air flow management and electrical power demands.

“I believe technological advances, behavior changes, and chemical management practices will make it possible for research environments to devote far less energy to air distribution than they do now,” he says. “As low-velocity fume hoods and air monitoring systems become more common and more reliable, and researchers become more familiar with conservation-related practices, environmental health and safety officials will understand that there are many efficient pathways to safety that don’t require extreme air change rates.”

Lab benches, according to Cannon, are also an exciting frontier in energy demand reduction. Just as Paradise’s organization often notes and reminds clients, lab equipment draws a lot of power, and practices such as turning off and unplugging apparatus when not in use can make big differences in overall sustainability initiatives.

“Investing in dedicated power circuits that support truly essential pieces of equipment and allowing unused items to go dormant when people go home can make a big difference,” Cannon says.

With the rise of sustainability practices, the design industry has also come a long way in terms of lab buildings. For example, some 10 years ago, common wisdom was that radiant or chilled beams don’t work in labs. That notion has since been refuted.

“Now, chilled beams are an accepted and often-used strategy,” says Lisa Fay Matthiessen, national sustainable design director at HGA Architects and Engineers. “Variable as opposed to constant volume returns at hoods are normal, as are sash controls, nighttime setbacks, shared freezers, and other controls strategies.”


Matthiessen and her colleagues have had remarkable success working with scientists to understand and address their specific needs, while finding ways to reduce plug loads without impacting their work in any way.

“This is a sensitive area, because the users truly cannot afford to compromise on their ability to work,” Matthiessen says. “However, by collaborating with users to identify more efficient equipment and ways of working, we have been able to substantially reduce energy use. The impact is doubled because the users are now fully invested in the performance of the building and are that much more committed to achieving the original performance goals.”

These efficient ways of adopting sustainability practices, which are often very commonsense concepts that involve saving energy and reducing water use, have immediate and clear financial and environmental impacts. Though for some, the end result is further removed.

“I think the disconnect that some folks might have with these practices is due to the fact that labs aren’t responsible for their power bills directly, so some researchers might not think about how cutting power consumption helps them directly, but not only is it good for the environment but it also frees up money for the university to use for other projects and programs that might benefit the labs directly,” says Nicastro.

Prior to participating in the sustainability programs, Nicastro’s lab was already very proactive with recycling and using washable glassware when possible, as opposed to disposable plastic. Their biggest challenge was turning off equipment when not being actively used and working to acquire more energy-efficient equipment and items made up of recycled contents.

“I think it’s also important that Green Labs highlighted how keeping lab spaces clean and organized helps with sustainability, as practices like having an annual lab clean-up day can reduce contamination issues and therefore reduce wasted reagents and plasticware, while disposing of no-longer-needed samples from freezers can free up freezer space so the lab doesn’t need to acquire or operate additional freezers,” he adds.

Role of tech

It’s true that much of what’s been surrounding sustainability has come in the form of basic changes. However, technological advances such as energy-efficient equipment and advances in solar power have also played a vital role in pushing forward such goals.

“I think that advances in lighting and solar power have been very important for this initiative, as far as bringing the costs down to a range where it makes fiscal sense for an institute to pursue adopting campaigns like LED retrofitting of lighting and installing solar panels on rooftops and over parking lots,” Nicastro says.

Related Article: A Lab Manager's Guide to Sustainable Lab Practices

“Our lab [also] recently replaced an over-ten-year-old ultra-low temp -80°C freezer with a newer model from Stirling Ultracold that has been designed differently than traditional deep freezers; the Stirling doesn’t use a traditional compressor, to save energy.”

However, as technology advances, it’s important to ensure that the people working with these new technologies are properly trained and able to handle the sophistication of these machines. Because without proper training, the full potential of equipment won’t always be realized. “I am sorry to report that over and over again I hear that the engineering and design worlds produce wonderful buildings and systems that are really hard to operate,” Cannon says. “Systems have become incredibly sophisticated, and in very tight labor markets, there are not enough people qualified to run them. A big part of the challenge in reducing building energy demands is an educational one—we need to train more people who can make the systems work right.”

Furthermore, for any sustainable initiative or design to work, function should define form in the way that a building is set up to perform as an efficient and supportive work environment, a productive space for human interaction, and a smart part of the natural world.

“A good lab should be laid out to make those experiences positive and not overly challenging,” Cannon says. “A building should also be designed and positioned to take advantage of the enormous free energy outside—light, heat, solar radiation—and to protect people and systems from the adverse effects of those same forces.”