Scientist wearing blue gloves pipetting a sample into a microcentrifuge tube during PFAS analysis, with additional sample vials visible in the foreground
Resource Guide

Implementing EPA 1633? Dual-Phase SPE Guidance and Performance Benchmarks

Review extraction protocols for PFAS in water and soil, and get expert support to accelerate method adoption

Written byWaters Corporation

Sample prep determines whether EPA 1633 analysis succeeds or fails. The method requires solid-phase extraction (SPE) protocols that work across 40 PFAS compounds in matrices ranging from drinking water to contaminated soil. Many labs face technical uncertainty about which cartridge orientation achieves required recovery rates for their specific sample types.

eBook cover


In Addressing the Global Challenge of PFAS Contamination, readers will find the regulatory context behind the method's expansion into new matrices, and the analytical requirements driving EPA's 2029 drinking water compliance deadlines. Beyond SPE guidance, the eBook offers insight into the instrument sensitivity and detection capabilities required to achieve sub-ppt quantitation, including performance data showing how advanced tandem quadrupole systems reach ng/L limits.

Download the eBook to:

  • Compare WAX/GCB versus GCB/WAX dual-phase cartridge orientations for aqueous and solid-matrix extraction 
  • Apply SPE workflows that meet EPA 1633 acceptance criteria for recovery and precision 
  • Benchmark your lab's setup against SGS INSTITUT FRESENIUS case study data showing method establishment timelines 
  • See how EPA 1633's expanded compound list connects to evolving drinking water regulations and non-targeted screening approaches

Sponsor

  • Waters logo

Top Image Credit:

CURRENT ISSUE - November/December 2025

AI & Automation

Preparing Your Lab for the Next Stage

Lab Manager Nov/Dec 2025 Cover Image