laboratory researcher working at a digital tabletop in an ultramodern lab illustrating the idea of incorporating AI technology into lab workspaces

How Lab Leaders Can Maximize AI Investments: Three Research-Backed Principles

Explore three data-driven strategies to guide artificial intelligence (AI) investment decisions and unlock the full potential of AI in laboratory environments.

Written byTrevor Henderson, PhD
| 4 min read
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
4:00

As artificial intelligence (AI) tools become increasingly prevalent in laboratory operations—from predictive analytics to automated quality control—leaders are under pressure to adopt AI in ways that deliver real business value. But amid the excitement, many organizations struggle to move beyond pilots and hype to sustainable, enterprise-wide impact.

A research briefing from the MIT Center for Information Systems Research (CISR) offers critical insight into this challenge. Titled AI Is Everybody’s Business, the report, authored by Barbara H. Wixom and Cynthia M. Beath, identifies three key principles that laboratory managers and scientific leaders should consider when making AI investments.

Barbara Wixom from the MIT Center for Information Systems Research

Barbara H. Wixom

MIT Center for Information Systems Research

Wixom, a principal research scientist at MIT CISR, and Beath, Professor Emerita at the University of Texas and academic research fellow with MIT CISR, draw upon years of data monetization research to provide a strategic roadmap for integrating AI into data-rich environments like laboratories.

Principle 1: Invest in Practices That Build AI-Ready Capabilities

Laboratories looking to implement AI must first develop the underlying capabilities that make AI successful. According to MIT CISR, these capabilities include:

Capability AreaExamples of Practices
Data ScienceTraining in ML/AI algorithms, model building
Data ManagementData cataloging tools, metadata management
Data PlatformScalable cloud infrastructure, data lakes
Ethical Data UseGovernance policies, ethical oversight committees
Customer UnderstandingMapping stakeholder or customer journeys

Wixom notes, “AI technology’s role is to help data monetization project teams use data in ways that humans cannot, usually because of big complexity or scope or required speed.”

To that end, labs must avoid the trap of thinking AI tools can replace expertise. Instead, leaders should:

  • Invest in both AI-specific and general data infrastructure by upgrading to scalable, cloud-based platforms that support advanced analytics, machine learning workflows, and seamless integration of lab data sources. This includes investing in high-performance computing resources, robust data storage, and flexible architecture that can grow with your needs.
  • Create ethical frameworks for responsible AI use by developing clear guidelines that define acceptable data usage, ensure algorithmic transparency, and align AI initiatives with your organization’s values. Establishing an ethics oversight committee can help evaluate potential risks and uphold trust.
  • Build policies that make data accessible while ensuring compliance by implementing secure access controls, tiered user permissions, and streamlined data-sharing protocols. Use data cataloging and lineage tools to support regulatory requirements while empowering users with the data they need.

“We worry that some leaders view buying AI products from providers as an opportunity to use AI without deep science skills; we do not advise this.” — Cynthia M. Beath 

Principle 2: Involve the Entire Lab in the AI Journey

While AI is often viewed as the domain of IT or data science teams, the MIT CISR study emphasizes that successful AI adoption requires broad organizational involvement.

In the lab setting, this means engaging:

  • Lab technicians to provide data context and validate model accuracy.
  • Scientists to generate AI use cases grounded in real problems.
  • Managers to ensure resources are aligned with AI project goals.
  • Quality and compliance teams to uphold standards.

This collaborative approach boosts transparency and helps non-technical staff:

  • Understand what AI can and cannot do.
  • Realize the time and cost involved in deployment.
  • Build trust in AI outputs.

Especially in the age of consumer-friendly tools like ChatGPT and generative AI platforms, MIT CISR encourages pervasive involvement in:

  • Ideating use cases by involving staff at all levels to brainstorm real-world lab challenges that AI could address. This ensures the development of relevant and practical applications grounded in scientific workflows.
  • Building and refining models through iterative collaboration between data scientists and lab experts. This includes training algorithms with quality lab data, validating outputs, and continuously adjusting parameters to improve accuracy and relevance.
  • Testing and monitoring outputs using structured QA protocols, feedback loops, and performance metrics. This process ensures that AI tools remain reliable over time, are compliant with regulatory standards, and are trusted by end users.

This inclusivity fuels innovation and makes it easier to scale AI adoption across departments.

Principle 3: Focus on Realizing Tangible Value from AI Projects

One of the most critical lessons from the briefing is that AI must deliver measurable value. In laboratory settings, this could mean:

  • Improving operational efficiency
  • Reducing instrument downtime
  • Enhancing quality assurance processes
  • Speeding up data analysis and decision-making

The report warns against endless experimentation without purpose. Instead, lab leaders should:

  • Align AI projects with business or research objectives by identifying specific problems or opportunities where AI can deliver measurable impact. Focus on areas that directly contribute to the lab’s strategic priorities, such as increasing throughput, reducing costs, or improving data accuracy.
  • Measure financial and operational outcomes by establishing baseline performance metrics and tracking improvements over time. This includes quantifying savings, productivity gains, or revenue enhancements generated by AI initiatives, using both short- and long-term benchmarks.
  • Assign accountability for results by designating responsible leaders or teams for each AI project. These individuals should oversee progress, troubleshoot issues, and ensure that AI investments translate into tangible business value.


AI Value Alignment ChecklistYes/No
Does this project solve a specific problem?
Is there a metric to evaluate success?
Are stakeholders aligned on expectations?
Is someone accountable for the outcome?

When labs approach AI with a value-focused mindset, they enter a "virtuous cycle," as Wixom describes:

“Engagement leads to better data and more bottom-line value, which leads to new ideas and more engagement, which further improves data and delivers more value.”

The Lab Leader’s Roadmap to Smarter AI Investments

To transform these principles into action, laboratory professionals can follow this step-by-step roadmap:

  1. Audit Current Capabilities: Assess your lab’s maturity in data management, infrastructure, and AI readiness.

  2. Build Cross-Functional AI Teams: Involve scientists, IT, QA, and operations in AI planning and execution.

  3. Establish Governance Protocols: Ensure ethical and compliant use of AI through policies and oversight.

  4. Start Small but Strategic: Identify pilot projects with high potential ROI and clear metrics.

  5. Track and Scale: Use outcome-based KPIs to guide scale-up decisions.

Conclusion: Making AI Everybody’s Business in the Lab

As Wixom and Beath argue in their MIT CISR briefing, AI’s value lies not just in the technology but in how people use it to solve problems, learn from outcomes, and drive meaningful change. For laboratory environments, where precision, regulation, and discovery intersect, that means integrating AI into both culture and operations.

Ultimately, making AI everybody’s business isn’t just a catchphrase—it’s a strategy for creating smarter, more resilient labs that can thrive in the data-driven future.


Further Resources:




This content includes text that has been generated with the assistance of AI. For more information, view Lab Manager’s AI use policy.

About the Author

  • Trevor Henderson headshot

    Trevor Henderson BSc (HK), MSc, PhD (c), has more than two decades of experience in the fields of scientific and technical writing, editing, and creative content creation. With academic training in the areas of human biology, physical anthropology, and community health, he has a broad skill set of both laboratory and analytical skills. Since 2013, he has been working with LabX Media Group developing content solutions that engage and inform scientists and laboratorians. He can be reached at thenderson@labmanager.com.

    View Full Profile

Related Topics

Loading Next Article...
Loading Next Article...

CURRENT ISSUE - May/June 2025

The Benefits, Business Case, And Planning Strategies Behind Lab Digitalization

Joining Processes And Software For a Streamlined, Quality-First Laboratory

Lab Manager May/June 2025 Cover Image