Leak-Free GC

Maintaining a leak-free GC or GC-MS system is critical for obtaining optimal system performance with reliable, reproducible, and accurate results.

Written byKen Lynam
| 7 min read
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
7:00

Tools, Supplies, and Best Practices for Improved Performance of Your GC or GC-MS Systems

This article discusses symptoms and problems typically observed because of leaks, how to identify leaks and correct them, and how to set up the system to avoid or minimize leaks. Topics include the use of high quality carrier gas, selection of the proper ferrule, proper just-tight-enough ferrule installation, how to check for leaks in GC and GC-MS systems, and making sure all column connections work together to create a leak-free environment.

Large leaks and small leaks

GC gas leaks fall into two distinct categories: large leaks that prevent the instrument from functioning and smaller leaks that allow the system to operate, but negatively impact chromatography.

Large leaks typically prevent a system from reaching a ready state, leading to an electronic pressure control (EPC) safety shutdown on equipped systems. These types of leaks can result if a column is not installed in the expected inlet or is not connected to the expected detector. Broken columns, broken or loose fittings, broken ferrules, cored septa, or blocked tubing are also possibilities. Visual inspection or review of the method settings will quickly identify the cause of major leaks.

However, identifying smaller leaks, which allow the system to continue to operate, can be more difficult. Symptoms of smaller leaks include continuous pressure cycling (oscillations greater than 0.02 psi), poor retention time reproducibility, higher than typical background, higher than typical bleed (particularly at temperatures above 230°C), baseline drift, higher than usual inlet activity, tailing peaks, the need for more frequent inlet maintenance, and poor area reproducibility.

An example of a minor leak is illustrated in Figure 1, which shows the elution of US EPA 8081 pesticides on a DB-1701 phase before and after exposure to 1,000 μL/L oxygen in helium carrier gas. After just 10 injections, column bleed increased significantly and a shift to shorter peak retention times was apparent.

Carrier gas considerations

To continue reading this article, sign up for FREE to
Lab Manager Logo
Membership is FREE and provides you with instant access to eNewsletters, digital publications, article archives, and more.

About the Author

Related Topics

CURRENT ISSUE - November/December 2025

AI & Automation

Preparing Your Lab for the Next Stage

Lab Manager Nov/Dec 2025 Cover Image