Advances in DNA sequencing technologies have revolutionized genomics, enabling researchers and laboratories to analyze genetic material with unprecedented speed and accuracy. Two of the most commonly used methods are Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) and Sanger Sequencing. While both methods serve crucial roles in molecular biology, their capabilities, applications, and cost structures differ significantly.

This article compares NGS and Sanger Sequencing, focusing on key factors such as throughput, accuracy, sample versatility, cost-effectiveness, and ease of use to help laboratories select the best DNA sequencing method for their research or diagnostic needs.

Get training in Biosafety and Biosecurity and earn CEUs.

One of over 25 IACET-accredited courses in the Academy.

Biosafety and Biosecurity course

What is Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)?

NGS is a high-throughput sequencing technology that allows for the parallel sequencing of millions of DNA fragments at once. This massively parallel approach enables the sequencing of entire genomes, transcriptomes, or targeted regions in a fraction of the time required by traditional methods.

Advantages of NGS:

• High Throughput: Capable of sequencing thousands to millions of sequences in a single run.
• Comprehensive Analysis: Ideal for whole genome, whole exome, or transcriptome sequencing.
• Cost-Effective for Large Projects: Cost per base decreases significantly with larger sample batches.
• Detects Variants and Mutations: Ideal for identifying SNPs, insertions, deletions, and structural variations.

Challenges of NGS:

• Higher Initial Cost: Requires expensive instruments and computational infrastructure.
• Complex Data Analysis: Generates large datasets requiring bioinformatics expertise.
• Sample Preparation Demands: Library preparation steps can be labor-intensive.

What is Sanger Sequencing?

Sanger Sequencing, also known as capillary electrophoresis sequencing, is a targeted sequencing method that uses fluorescently labeled chain-terminating nucleotides to determine the DNA sequence of a specific region.

Advantages of Sanger Sequencing:

• Gold Standard Accuracy: Especially reliable for sequencing single genes or short regions.
• Straightforward Workflow:Library preparation and analysis are simpler than NGS.
• Ideal for Small Projects: Cost-effective for low sample volumes or targeted gene sequencing.
• Minimal Bioinformatics Required:Data analysis is relatively simple.

Challenges of Sanger Sequencing:

• Low Throughput: Can only sequence one fragment per reaction.
• Higher Per-Sample Cost for Large Projects: Cost scales poorly with higher sample numbers.
• Limited to Short Reads: Typically sequences fragments up to 1,000 base pairs.

Throughput: Processing Large vs. Small Projects

NGS excels in high-throughput sequencing, capable of analyzing millions of sequences simultaneously. This makes it the preferred method for large-scale projects, such as whole genome sequencing, microbial metagenomics, or population studies. In cancer genomics, NGS enables comprehensive profiling of tumor samples, identifying mutations, copy number variations, and structural rearrangements across entire genomes. In microbial ecology, NGS allows researchers to analyze the composition of microbial communities in environmental samples, such as soil or water, through metagenomic studies.

In contrast, Sanger Sequencing is low-throughput, sequencing one fragment at a time. It’s best suited for small projects, such as validating individual genetic variants identified in NGS screens or sequencing single genes of interest. Clinical genetics labs often rely on Sanger Sequencing to confirm pathogenic variants detected during newborn screening programs or diagnostic genetic testing. In molecular biology research, Sanger is commonly used for sequencing plasmid inserts and validating site-directed mutagenesis in genetic engineering experiments.

✅ Verdict: NGS offers unparalleled throughput, while Sanger Sequencing is suitable for smaller-scale analysis.

Accuracy: Achieving Reliable DNA Data

Sanger Sequencing is widely considered the gold standard for DNA sequencing accuracy, with extremely low error rates over short sequences (up to 1,000 base pairs). It’s ideal for clinical diagnostics and reference sequence generation. For example, clinical genetic testing labs use Sanger Sequencing to confirm pathogenic variants detected by screening tests in conditions like cystic fibrosis, inherited cancers, and rare genetic diseases. It’s also frequently used in pharmaceutical quality control for verifying plasmid constructs used in gene therapy development, ensuring sequence accuracy prior to therapeutic production.

NGS, while highly accurate overall, can introduce errors in repetitive regions, homopolymers, or low-coverage areas. However, these errors can often be mitigated through deep sequencing coverage and advanced bioinformatics. Cancer research labs rely on NGS to detect mutations in heterogeneous tumor samples, where the ability to sequence millions of fragments allows detection of low-frequency variants. In microbial genomics, NGS allows for assembly of entire microbial genomes, even in mixed populations, providing critical data for epidemiological studies and outbreak tracing.

✅ Verdict: Sanger Sequencing offers superior accuracy for individual sequences, while NGS provides accurate data across large datasets with sufficient coverage.

Sample Versatility: Analyzing Different Types of Samples

NGS supports a wide range of applications, including whole genome sequencing, exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, metagenomics, and epigenetics studies. It’s versatile enough to handle degraded DNA, mixed microbial samples, and low-input samples. For example, cancer research laboratories use NGS to sequence entire tumor genomes, identifying mutations, structural rearrangements, and copy number variations that can guide personalized treatment plans. In microbial ecology, NGS enables the profiling of microbial diversity in environmental samples such as soil, wastewater, and ocean sediments. NGS also plays a crucial role in infectious disease surveillance, allowing public health agencies to track viral evolution and detect emerging pathogens by sequencing viral genomes directly from patient samples.

Sanger Sequencing is best suited for high-quality, purified DNA and targeted sequencing of single genes or amplicons. It’s frequently used for confirming mutations identified through other methods. For instance, clinical genetics laboratories commonly rely on Sanger sequencing to validate pathogenic variants detected by NGS in diagnostic screenings for inherited diseases such as cystic fibrosis or BRCA-related cancers. In molecular biology research, Sanger sequencing is routinely used for confirming gene insertions in plasmid constructs used in genetic engineering and synthetic biology projects.

✅ Verdict: NGS offers broader sample versatility, while Sanger Sequencing excels at analyzing targeted, high-quality samples.

Cost-Effectiveness: Balancing Budget and Scale

NGS has higher upfront costs, with sequencing instruments ranging from $50,000 to over $1 million, depending on the platform and sequencing capacity. However, the cost per base is significantly lower when sequencing large numbers of samples, making it the most cost-effective option for large-scale projects. For example, population-scale genomic studies and microbial metagenomic surveys benefit greatly from NGS due to its ability to process thousands of samples in parallel at a low per-sample cost.

Sanger Sequencing is cost-effective for small projects, with per-sample costs typically around $5 to $10 for short reads up to 1,000 base pairs. This makes Sanger ideal for clinical labs performing targeted gene sequencing or academic researchers needing to verify small plasmid inserts or single-gene mutations. However, costs increase substantially when scaling up to hundreds or thousands of sequences, making it less practical for high-throughput projects.

✅ Verdict: NGS is more cost-effective for large-scale projects, while Sanger Sequencing is ideal for small projects.

Ease of Use: Simplifying Workflow and Data Analysis

Sanger Sequencing offers a simpler workflow with minimal sample preparation, straightforward data analysis, and user-friendly software for fragment interpretation. This makes it ideal for clinical diagnostic labs that need to quickly validate known mutations or assess a single gene for disease screening. It is also the preferred method for plasmid verification in molecular biology, allowing researchers to confirm gene insertions or modifications without requiring advanced computational skills.

NGS, on the other hand, requires complex library preparation, sequencing run setup, and bioinformatics analysis to interpret the massive datasets it generates. Significant training and expertise are needed for both wet lab and computational steps. This complexity is justified in fields like cancer genomics, where whole-genome or exome sequencing can uncover novel mutations or structural variations. In microbiome research, NGS data requires specialized pipelines to classify and quantify microbial species, ensuring accurate characterization of environmental or clinical microbiomes.

✅ Verdict: Sanger Sequencing is easier to perform and analyze, while NGS requires more expertise and infrastructure.

Summary Table: NGS vs. Sanger Sequencing

Conclusion: Choosing the Right Sequencing Method for Your Lab

The decision between Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) and Sanger Sequencing depends on your laboratory’s project size, sample type, budget, and bioinformatics capabilities.

• For large-scale projects, such as microbial diversity studies, population genetics, or cancer genome profiling, NGS offers the throughput, cost-efficiency, and versatility required.
• For small projects, like gene variant confirmation, clinical diagnostics, or sequencing individual genes, Sanger Sequencing remains the gold standard due to its accuracy, ease of use, and affordability for small-scale analysis.

Many laboratories use a hybrid approach, leveraging NGS for discovery-based projects and using Sanger Sequencing for follow-up validation and confirmatory testing.

This content includes text that has been generated with the assistance of AI. Lab Manager’s AI policy can be found here.