A gloved hand holds a plastic vessel until a water faucet
Whitepaper

PFAS Testing Decisions: Expand In-House or Use Contract Labs?

Understand when it’s worth investing in PFAS instrumentation for drinking water analysis, and when outsourcing is the better fit

Written byWaters Corporation

PFAS testing in drinking water comes at a price: six-figure instruments, specialized staff, and contamination controls that don’t come standard. Depending on sample load and turnaround needs, outsourcing may offer better value—and fewer headaches.

Case Study Cover Image


Based on a webinar discussion between a public health scientist and a contract lab director, this resource offers side-by-side views on how labs with different mandates approach PFAS testing. They share priorities around data quality, sample preparation, and long-term planning, giving lab teams a peer-informed lens on one of the toughest decisions in environmental testing today.

Download the case study to:

  • See real-world cost thresholds where in-house PFAS testing starts to pay off
  • Learn what to expect when staffing and training an in-house PFAS team
  • Explore how labs manage sample complexity, including turbidity and ultra-short-chain PFAS
  • Get context on PFAS method choices, from EPA 533 to 1633

Sponsor

  • Waters logo

Top Image Credit:

Current Magazine Issue Background Image

CURRENT ISSUE - March/2026

When the Unexpected Hits

How Lab Leaders Can Prepare for Safety Crises That Don’t Follow the Script

Lab Manager March 2026 Cover Image