Applied DNA Sciences loses unemployment appeals

The California Unemployment Appeals Board has ruled against Applied DNA Sciences, Inc. in its effort to disqualify three former employees from receiving unemployment insurance benefits.

APDN, presently based in S

Written byLab Manager
| 1 min read
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
1:00

The California Unemployment Appeals Board has ruled against Applied DNA Sciences, Inc. in its effort to disqualify three former employees from receiving unemployment insurance benefits.

APDN, presently based in Stony Brook, New York, offers botanical DNA-based protection against counterfeiting, fraud, identity theft and similar illegal acts.

Lab manager academy logo

Lab Management Certificate

The Lab Management certificate is more than training—it’s a professional advantage.

Gain critical skills and IACET-approved CEUs that make a measurable difference.

"Two of the three former executives worked for several months without pay, out of loyalty to the company and promises based on supposedly groundbreaking technology provided by Biowell Technologies Inc. of Taiwan, and the third remained in employment limbo," said Peter M. Kunstler, attorney for the claimants "After terminating the employees without explanation, APDN claimed that the employees were separated from their jobs because of fraudulent activity."

Kunstler said the Appeals Board agreed that the fraud and collusion charges were unfounded.

"We believe the terminations actually resulted from an array of breaches by both old and new management," he said.

Kunstler, of the law firm Makarem & Associates APLC, is preparing for the May, 2007 trial of a civil suit against APDN on behalf of four former employees, based on breach of contract and violations of California Labor Law.

Interested in lab leadership?

Subscribe to our free Lab Leadership Digest Newsletter.

Is the form not loading? If you use an ad blocker or browser privacy features, try turning them off and refresh the page.

By subscribing, you agree to receive email related to Lab Manager content and products. You may unsubscribe at any time.

APDN hired the claimants in 2003 and 2004. Concerns over their employment status and changes in the direction of the company led the claimants to request written severance agreements. The COO/Acting CFO/Contracts Manager of the company, Karin Klemm, executed Addenda to the claimants' employment contracts, which new management contended were fraudulently procured. This was the basis for APDN's challenge which the ALJ overruled in the decision confirmed by the Appeals Board.

Source: BusinessWire.com

Loading Next Article...
Loading Next Article...

CURRENT ISSUE - May/June 2025

The Benefits, Business Case, And Planning Strategies Behind Lab Digitalization

Joining Processes And Software For a Streamlined, Quality-First Laboratory

Lab Manager May/June 2025 Cover Image