AI integration in workplace safety and lab management.

ASSP White Paper Highlights Growing Role of AI in Workplace Safety

The report explores how AI tools are reshaping safety risk management and professional responsibilities

Written byMichelle Gaulin
| 2 min read
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00

The American Society of Safety Professionals (ASSP) has released a white paper examining how AI in workplace safety is beginning to reshape the environmental, health, and safety profession, with early adopters already using artificial intelligence tools to improve safety reporting, risk identification, and workplace decision-making.

The report, titled AI and the Evolving Role of EHS Professionals, describes how organizations are integrating machine learning, automation, and data analytics into safety risk management efforts while emphasizing that human expertise remains essential for interpretation and oversight.

For laboratory environments, where hazard monitoring, regulatory compliance, and incident prevention are core operational priorities, the findings reflect broader trends toward digital transformation and predictive risk management.

Organizations are already using accessible AI tools to:

  • Analyze incident and inspection data
  • Automate documentation and reporting workflows
  • Develop training materials and procedures
  • Improve communication across teams

These applications can reduce administrative workload and allow EHS professionals to focus more on strategic safety initiatives.

From reactive response to predictive safety risk management

One of the most significant opportunities identified in the report is shifting safety programs from reactive incident response to proactive hazard prevention. Technologies such as machine learning algorithms, connected sensors, and video analytics can help organizations identify patterns and early warning indicators before incidents occur.

In laboratory settings, these capabilities could support monitoring of exposure conditions, equipment performance, and procedural compliance. Predictive insights may help managers identify emerging risks earlier and strengthen safety risk management programs before problems escalate.

EHS professionals remain central despite automation

The white paper stresses that artificial intelligence is not intended to replace safety professionals. Instead, it is expected to enhance decision-making by providing additional insights and analytical capabilities that support professional judgment.

“As part of ASSP’s AI strategy, we are laser-focused on how AI can help our members make their workplaces safer,” said Stephanie Johnson, CSP, CHMM, director-at-large and chair of the AI Task Force. “As AI becomes more integrated into safety professionals’ daily work, now is the moment for our profession to help shape its ethical, transparent, and responsible use.”

Maintaining trust, transparency, and accountability will require ongoing involvement from experienced EHS professionals as organizations adopt new technologies.

Strategic priorities for AI integration

To support adoption across the profession, ASSP identified five strategic focus areas:

  • Strategic leadership
  • AI competency development
  • Research initiatives
  • Trusted authority and guidance
  • Ethical leadership

These priorities aim to help safety leaders evaluate tools responsibly, build workforce skills, and maintain professional leadership as technology capabilities evolve.

Implications for laboratory leaders

For laboratory managers and safety leaders, the report highlights several potential applications:

  • Automating compliance documentation and reporting
  • Enhancing hazard monitoring through data analytics
  • Identifying leading indicators of safety risks
  • Improving training delivery and accessibility
  • Supporting proactive safety culture development

As laboratories continue adopting digital technologies, AI in workplace safety may become an increasingly important component of modern safety risk management programs, particularly in environments with complex hazards and regulatory requirements.

This article was created with the assistance of Generative AI and has undergone editorial review before publishing.

Add Lab Manager as a preferred source on Google

Add Lab Manager as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

About the Author

  • Headshot photo of Michelle Gaulin

    Michelle Gaulin is an associate editor for Lab Manager. She holds a bachelor of journalism degree from Toronto Metropolitan University in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and has two decades of experience in editorial writing, content creation, and brand storytelling. In her role, she contributes to the production of the magazine’s print and online content, collaborates with industry experts, and works closely with freelance writers to deliver high-quality, engaging material.

    Her professional background spans multiple industries, including automotive, travel, finance, publishing, and technology. She specializes in simplifying complex topics and crafting compelling narratives that connect with both B2B and B2C audiences.

    In her spare time, Michelle enjoys outdoor activities and cherishes time with her daughter. She can be reached at mgaulin@labmanager.com.

    View Full Profile

Related Topics

Loading Next Article...
Loading Next Article...

CURRENT ISSUE - January/February 2026

How to Build Trust Into Every Lab Result

Applying the Six Cs Helps Labs Deliver Results Stakeholders Can Rely On

Lab Manager January/February 2026 Cover Image