What is Force Field Analysis?
Force Field Analysis is a structured decision-making technique developed by psychologist Kurt Lewin. This method helps individuals and organizations systematically evaluate the driving forces (pros) and restraining forces (cons) affecting a decision. By assigning numerical values to each factor, decision-makers can gain a clearer understanding of whether a proposed change is likely to succeed or fail.
Unlike gut-based decision-making, which can be influenced by bias, Force Field Analysis provides a rational framework that ensures transparency, consistency, and better decision outcomes.
Lab Management Certificate
The Lab Management certificate is more than training—it’s a professional advantage.
Gain critical skills and IACET-approved CEUs that make a measurable difference.
Why Use Force Field Analysis?
- Improves decision-making clarity by identifying supporting and opposing factors.
- Enhances strategic planning by helping teams assess the feasibility of changes.
- Encourages logical reasoning instead of relying on emotions or assumptions.
- Provides a structured approach to overcoming resistance to change.
- Supports collaboration by ensuring all stakeholders' concerns are considered.
How to Conduct a Force Field Analysis
Step 1: Define the Decision or Change Needed
Begin by writing a clear statement of what needs to be decided. A well-defined statement eliminates ambiguity and ensures all participants understand the issue.
Example: "Should we implement a remote work policy for our company?"
Step 2: Identify Driving and Restraining Forces
Create two lists:
- Driving Forces (pros): Factors that support or favor the decision.
- Restraining Forces (cons): Factors that oppose or challenge the decision.
For the remote work example:
| Driving Forces (Pros) | Restraining Forces (Cons) |
|---|---|
| Increased employee productivity | Difficulty in monitoring employee performance |
| Reduced office expenses | Potential communication challenges |
| Higher job satisfaction | Security risks with remote access |
| Expanded talent pool | Reduced team cohesion |
Step 3: Assign a Score to Each Factor
Using a scale of 1 to 5 (where 1 is weak and 5 is strong), score each factor based on its perceived impact.
| Driving Forces (Pros) | Score | Restraining Forces (Cons) | Score |
| Increased employee productivity | 4 | Difficulty in monitoring employee performance | 3 |
| Reduced office expenses | 3 | Potential communication challenges | 2 |
| Higher job satisfaction | 5 | Security risks with remote access | 4 |
| Expanded talent pool | 4 | Reduced team cohesion | 3 |
Step 4: Analyze the Results
Add up the scores for both lists.
- Driving Forces Total: 4+3+5+4 = 16
- Restraining Forces Total: 3+2+4+3 = 12
If the driving forces outweigh the restraining forces, the decision is favorable. However, before finalizing, review whether certain less significant factors are skewing the results and whether scores are realistic.
Step 5: Strengthen Driving Forces & Reduce Restraining Forces
If the decision is not clear-cut, consider ways to increase the score of driving forces and decrease the impact of restraining forces.
Example Solutions:
- Address communication challenges by implementing better remote work tools (e.g., Slack, Zoom, project management software).
- Strengthen security by using VPNs and strict cybersecurity policies.
- Improve team cohesion with regular virtual team-building activities.
After making these adjustments, reassign scores and reassess the decision.
Step 6: Final Decision and Implementation
By now, the decision should be clearer. While the outcome may not always align with initial preferences, Force Field Analysis ensures a rational, well-explained, and transparent approach to decision-making.
Real-World Applications of Force Field Analysis
1. Business Strategy Development
Companies use Force Field Analysis to determine whether they should enter new markets, launch new products, or implement process changes.
2. Organizational Change Management
When transitioning to new workplace policies, such as flexible work schedules or digital transformation, this technique helps evaluate feasibility and resistance.
3. Project Management
Project managers use this method to assess potential risks and benefits before approving new initiatives or altering existing processes.
4. Healthcare & Public Policy
Hospitals and government agencies use Force Field Analysis to evaluate medical interventions, public health strategies, and regulatory changes.
Advantages and Limitations of Force Field Analysis
Advantages:
✅ Objective Decision-Making: Eliminates emotional biases.
✅ Clear Visual Representation: Helps teams understand factors affecting the decision.
✅ Encourages Collaboration: Involves multiple perspectives.
✅ Supports Change Management: Helps organizations plan for resistance and mitigate risks.
Limitations:
⚠ Subjectivity in Scoring: Different stakeholders may assign different scores.
⚠ Lack of Weighting Factors: Some factors may be more critical than others, but the system doesn’t always reflect this.
⚠ Not Suitable for Complex Decisions: For multi-layered decisions, additional analysis methods may be required.
Conclusion
Force Field Analysis is a powerful decision-making framework that provides clarity, structure, and a data-driven approach to evaluating choices. By systematically identifying driving and restraining forces, organizations and individuals can make more informed, strategic, and effective decisions.
Whether you're a business leader, project manager, or policy-maker, incorporating Force Field Analysis into your decision-making process can lead to better outcomes, reduced risk, and improved change management.
