Design Hurdles, Design Solutions

Innovation in electronic pipettors may overcome shortcomings of the past.

Written byRob Zier andMarc Hamel
| 4 min read
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
4:00

In the Guest Spotlight section of the November 2007 issue of Lab Manager (Vol. 2, No. 11, p. 10), Ned Gravel said, “If we treat people as resources we may get maximum ‘use’ of them, but we will not get maximum ‘benefit’ from them.” If viewing people (personnel) as “resources” is counterproductive to successful lab management, how then do we increase efficiencies, standardize procedures and improve the workplace, and still accept (and account for) individual variability and idiosyncrasies?

One answer lies in using proper and productive lab equipment, which produces standardized results regardless of the technician involved. Electronic handheld pipettors are one type of equipment that can achieve that goal.

Electronic pipettors have been around for 22 years and were spurred on by the success of manual handheld pipettors, which preceded them. Yet their acceptance by the research community as a whole has been a challenge for instrument designers and manufacturers. Since they comprise only 10 to 15 percent of the total in-use pipettor market, if electronic pipettors meet so many of the modern lab’s needs, why has their use been so limited?

The good

To continue reading this article, sign up for FREE to
Lab Manager Logo
Membership is FREE and provides you with instant access to eNewsletters, digital publications, article archives, and more.

About the Authors

Related Topics

CURRENT ISSUE - October 2025

Turning Safety Principles Into Daily Practice

Move Beyond Policies to Build a Lab Culture Where Safety is Second Nature

Lab Manager October 2025 Cover Image