Found: Preserved Dinosaur Cells–but Sadly Scientists Still Can’t Build Jurassic World

Palaeontologist Dr Gareth Dyke writes for The Conversation about the scientific debate around the new Jurassic World film

Written byUniversity of Southampton
| 3 min read
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
3:00

The science behind the Jurassic Park films always seemed far-fetched, even before the latest installment, Jurassic World, introduced the idea of genetically engineered super-dinosaurs.

For one thing, finding mosquitoes that had drunk the blood of dinosaurs and then been preserved in amber for hundreds of millions of years is incredibly unlikely. But there’s another more important reason: organic molecules such as proteins and DNA degrade fast after a creature’s death. They are almost never found preserved in bones older than a few thousand years. This has been the dogma for many years.

The idea of molecular-level preservation within fossils has always been controversial. No DNA has ever been extracted, for example, from a dinosaur bone precisely because this complex molecule degrades away over relatively short periods of geological time.

To continue reading this article, sign up for FREE to
Lab Manager Logo
Membership is FREE and provides you with instant access to eNewsletters, digital publications, article archives, and more.

CURRENT ISSUE - October 2025

Turning Safety Principles Into Daily Practice

Move Beyond Policies to Build a Lab Culture Where Safety is Second Nature

Lab Manager October 2025 Cover Image