AI workforce retraining is becoming a core operational issue as artificial intelligence shifts from a specialized tool to a routine part of daily work. New findings highlighted by the American Psychological Association show that AI adoption is accelerating across sectors, moving quickly from experimentation to regular use and creating new demands on workforce development and training structures.

In spring 2025, nearly 47 percent of workers reported using AI tools at least once a month, up from 34 percent the previous year. Dennis Stolle of the APA’s Office of Applied Psychology noted that for nearly one-quarter of workers, AI use is now a weekly activity. In laboratory settings, this pattern reflects growing reliance on AI-enabled software for data analysis, automation, and workflow optimization, increasing pressure on lab managers to align staffing models and professional development with rapidly changing technologies.

AI workforce retraining introduces new operational pressures

About one in five workers report feeling pressured by employers to use AI tools, while roughly three in 10 worry about falling behind if they do not adopt them. Stolle described this pressure as a new workplace stressor tied directly to AI integration.

In laboratory environments, these pressures can emerge when staff are expected to work with AI-supported data analysis platforms, automated imaging systems, or predictive maintenance tools without sufficient training or transition time. Without structured AI workforce retraining, labs risk reduced productivity, inconsistent data interpretation, and higher turnover as staff struggle to adapt.

Laboratory workforce development faces funding constraints

Rachel Lipson, scholar in residence and co-founder of Harvard University’s Project on Workforce, emphasized that workforce development in the US remains chronically underfunded. She noted that active labor market policy spending sits at roughly 0.1 percent of GDP, ranking near the bottom among Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries.

For laboratory workforce development, this funding gap limits access to scalable retraining programs that support AI adoption. Lipson pointed to previous waves of technological change that left displaced workers without adequate support, resulting in prolonged job transitions and long-term impacts on worker well-being and community stability.

Training models for AI-driven lab roles

Lipson outlined three job categories that shape AI workforce retraining strategies:

• Frontier roles: New positions created by AI technologies, such as roles focused on AI model oversight, data integration, or automation validation; these positions often require entirely new training pathways
• Retooled roles: Existing jobs where core responsibilities evolve due to AI-enabled tools; many lab positions fall into this category as AI augments data interpretation, quality monitoring, and operational decision-making
• Legacy roles: Traditional positions that remain essential but face workforce aging and retirement risks, requiring renewed attention to training continuity

Designing retraining for an aging lab workforce

Margaret Beier, director of the Adult Skills and Knowledge Lab at Rice University, highlighted the implications of an aging workforce. Workers aged 55 and older represent the fastest-growing segment of the labor force. While research shows older learners perform well in self-directed learning environments, they often require additional time and practice to acquire new technical skills.

Lab Quality Management Certificate

The Lab Quality Management certificate is more than training—it’s a professional advantage.

Gain critical skills and IACET-approved CEUs that make a measurable difference.

Technology can also support AI workforce retraining through massive open online courses, virtual and augmented reality platforms, and AI-driven personalized learning systems. Beier noted that machine learning enables adaptive training approaches tailored to individual learning needs.

What lab managers should take away

Jaime Teevan, chief scientist and technical fellow at Microsoft, emphasized that AI delivers the greatest value when designed to support collaboration, not just individual output. Early research suggests teams working alongside AI tools produce stronger results than individuals alone.

For lab managers, AI workforce retraining is now a core operational responsibility. Aligning AI adoption in laboratories with structured training, workforce support, and thoughtful organizational design will shape how effectively labs sustain performance, data quality, and staff engagement in an increasingly AI-enabled environment.

This article was created with the assistance of Generative AI and has undergone editorial review before publishing.