lab technician filters a sample into a vial when preparing samples technicians may have to choose from SPE, LLE, or filtration methods

Solid Phase Extraction vs Liquid-Liquid Extraction vs Filtration: Which Extraction Method is More Efficient?

Compare Solid Phase Extraction (SPE), Liquid-Liquid Extraction (LLE), and Filtration to determine which extraction method is most efficient for your laboratory needs.

Written byTrevor Henderson, PhD
| 4 min read
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
4:00

Efficient extraction methods are critical in analytical chemistry, environmental testing, pharmaceuticals, and food science for isolating target compounds from complex mixtures. Three commonly used techniques are Solid Phase Extraction (SPE), Liquid-Liquid Extraction (LLE), and Filtration. Each method offers unique advantages and is suited for different types of samples, analytes, and matrices.

Selecting the right method depends on factors such as sample composition, desired purity, analyte properties, and laboratory throughput requirements. This article compares SPE vs LLE vs Filtration, examining how each technique works, their advantages, limitations, and which method is most efficient for your specific application.

Lab manager academy logo

Lab Management Certificate

The Lab Management certificate is more than training—it’s a professional advantage.

Gain critical skills and IACET-approved CEUs that make a measurable difference.


What is Solid Phase Extraction (SPE)?

Definition and Overview

Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) is a highly efficient sample preparation technique that isolates and concentrates target analytes from complex matrices by passing a liquid sample through a solid sorbent material. The solid phase selectively retains the desired compounds, while unwanted impurities are washed away. The retained analytes are then eluted with a suitable solvent, resulting in a purified extract ready for analysis. SPE is commonly used in environmental analysis, pharmaceutical testing, food safety, and clinical diagnostics due to its high selectivity, reproducibility, and compatibility with automated systems.

How SPE Works

  1. Condition the solid phase (cartridge, disk, or plate) with solvents to prepare the sorbent surface.

  2. Load the liquid sample onto the solid phase.

  3. Wash away unwanted impurities.

  4. Elute the target compounds with an appropriate solvent.

Advantages of SPE

  • High selectivity for target compounds.
  • Efficient removal of matrix interferences.
  • Compatible with automation for high-throughput workflows.
  • Reduces solvent consumption compared to LLE.
  • Works well for environmental, biological, and pharmaceutical samples.

Limitations of SPE

  • Requires method development for optimal conditions.
  • Sorbent selection and conditioning are critical to success.
  • Not suitable for large sample volumes without specialized equipment.

What is Liquid-Liquid Extraction (LLE)?

Definition and Overview

Liquid-Liquid Extraction (LLE) is a traditional separation technique that relies on the differential solubility of compounds between two immiscible liquid phases, typically an aqueous phase and an organic solvent. By exploiting differences in polarity, analytes partition preferentially into one phase while impurities remain in the other. LLE is particularly effective for extracting nonpolar and semi-polar compounds from water or biological fluids, and it is widely used in environmental testing, pharmaceutical analysis, and food safety applications. Although labor-intensive, LLE is well-suited for processing large sample volumes and remains a key method for liquid sample extraction.

How LLE Works

  1. Mix the sample with an immiscible organic solvent.

  2. The analytes partition between the aqueous and organic phases based on their relative solubility.

  3. Separate the two phases.

  4. Collect the phase containing the desired analytes for further analysis.

Advantages of LLE

  • Suitable for large sample volumes.
  • Effective for nonpolar and semi-polar analytes.
  • Well-established technique for environmental, food, and clinical samples.
  • Minimal instrumentation is required.

Limitations of LLE

  • Labor-intensive and time-consuming.
  • High solvent consumption.
  • Emulsions can form, making phase separation difficult.
  • Less selective than SPE.

What is Filtration?

Definition and Overview

Filtration is a mechanical separation process used to remove particulates, suspended solids, and debris from liquid or gas samples by passing them through a porous membrane or filter medium. Filtration is commonly used as a pre-treatment step before analysis, ensuring that sample particulates do not interfere with analytical instruments. It is widely employed in environmental monitoring, food and beverage testing, pharmaceutical manufacturing, and clinical diagnostics. Though primarily focused on particle removal, filtration can be combined with SPE or LLE for more comprehensive sample cleanup when both particulates and dissolved compounds must be addressed.

How Filtration Works

  1. Pass the sample through a filter membrane or filter paper.

  2. Particulates are retained on the filter surface or within the membrane pores.

  3. The filtered liquid (filtrate) is collected for further analysis.

Advantages of Filtration

  • Simple, low-cost method.
  • Removes suspended solids and particulates.
  • Minimal sample preparation is required.
  • Compatible with a wide range of sample types.
  • Can be combined with SPE or LLE for enhanced sample cleanup.

Limitations of Filtration

  • Does not remove dissolved contaminants.
  • Limited selectivity for specific analytes.
  • Filter clogging can occur with high particulate loads.
  • Not suitable for selective compound isolation.

SPE vs LLE vs Filtration: Key Differences

AspectSolid Phase Extraction (SPE)Liquid-Liquid Extraction (LLE)Filtration
Primary FunctionSelective analyte isolationSolvent-based partitioningParticulate removal
SelectivityHighModerateLow
Solvent UseLow to moderateHighNone to low
Sample VolumeSmall to moderateLargeSmall to large
Analyte TypesWide rangeNonpolar/semi-polarSuspended particulates
Automation PotentialHighLowModerate
Labor RequirementsModerateHighLow
Equipment RequirementsSpecialized cartridges/platesSeparatory funnelsSimple filtration apparatus
Time EfficiencyHighLowHigh

Applications of SPE, LLE, and Filtration

Environmental Analysis

Environmental laboratories frequently encounter complex sample matrices such as wastewater, surface water, and soil extracts, requiring efficient extraction methods to isolate contaminants for further analysis. Whether monitoring pesticides, industrial pollutants, or pharmaceutical residues, the choice of extraction technique can significantly impact detection limits and analytical accuracy.

Interested in chemistry and materials science?

Subscribe to our free Chemistry & Materials Science Newsletter.

Is the form not loading? If you use an ad blocker or browser privacy features, try turning them off and refresh the page.

By subscribing, you agree to receive email related to Lab Manager content and products. You may unsubscribe at any time.

  • SPE: Concentrates pesticides, herbicides, and pharmaceutical residues from water samples.
  • LLE: Extracts semi-volatile organics from wastewater.
  • Filtration: Removes particulate matter from surface water prior to analysis.

Pharmaceutical Analysis

In pharmaceutical development and quality control, extracting target compounds from biological fluids, formulations, or raw materials is essential for ensuring accurate quantification and regulatory compliance. Extraction techniques are used to isolate active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), metabolites, and impurities to ensure product safety and efficacy.

  • SPE: Isolates drug metabolites from plasma.
  • LLE: Extracts lipophilic compounds from biological fluids.
  • Filtration: Removes precipitated proteins from drug formulations.

Food and Beverage Testing

Food safety and quality testing laboratories must process diverse food matrices, from liquids like juices and oils to complex solids such as grains and dairy products. Effective extraction techniques help isolate contaminants, nutrients, and residues, ensuring products meet safety regulations and labeling requirements.

  • SPE: Captures mycotoxins and veterinary drug residues from food matrices.
  • LLE: Extracts fat-soluble vitamins from oils.
  • Filtration: Removes suspended solids from juices and beverages.

Clinical and Biomedical Research

Biomedical and clinical laboratories rely heavily on extraction techniques to prepare biological samples, such as blood, urine, and tissue homogenates, for downstream analysis. Whether screening for drug metabolites, hormones, or biomarkers, proper extraction is crucial to obtain accurate and reproducible results.

  • SPE: Prepares urine and serum samples for drug screening.
  • LLE: Isolates hormones and steroids from biological fluids.
  • Filtration: Clarifies cell culture media prior to analysis.

When to Use SPE, LLE, or Filtration

Scenario
Use SPE
Use LLE
Use Filtration
Selective analyte isolation

Processing large sample volumes
Removing suspended particulates

Preparing complex biological samples
Minimizing solvent use
High-throughput workflows
Simple sample cleanup


Conclusion

Each extraction method—Solid Phase Extraction (SPE), Liquid-Liquid Extraction (LLE), and Filtration—has its own strengths and ideal use cases. SPE offers superior selectivity and is highly compatible with automated workflows, making it ideal for complex samples requiring selective isolation. LLE, while labor-intensive, is particularly effective for large-volume extractions and nonpolar analytes. Filtration remains the simplest option for removing particulates prior to further processing.

Selecting the most efficient method depends on the sample matrix, target analytes, workflow throughput, and available equipment, with many laboratories employing a combination of techniques for optimal results.

About the Author

  • Trevor Henderson headshot

    Trevor Henderson BSc (HK), MSc, PhD (c), has more than two decades of experience in the fields of scientific and technical writing, editing, and creative content creation. With academic training in the areas of human biology, physical anthropology, and community health, he has a broad skill set of both laboratory and analytical skills. Since 2013, he has been working with LabX Media Group developing content solutions that engage and inform scientists and laboratorians. He can be reached at thenderson@labmanager.com.

    View Full Profile
Loading Next Article...
Loading Next Article...

CURRENT ISSUE - May/June 2025

The Benefits, Business Case, And Planning Strategies Behind Lab Digitalization

Joining Processes And Software For a Streamlined, Quality-First Laboratory

Lab Manager May/June 2025 Cover Image