2014 Shaker Survey Results

The wide variety of lab-shaker designs on the market reflects the increasing diversity of scientific experimentation. Labs now use a greater range of sample sizes than ever before, from liters to microliters. And while replicate and combinatorial studies increase the number of samples, requirements for environmental control create yet a third dimension that shaker designers must consider.

By Trevor Henderson

Top 5 Questions You Should Ask When Buying an Laboratory Shaker

  1. What is the capacity of the unit (both for total weight and volume)?
  2. What accessories are available?
  3. What is the RPM range and what increments can it be controlled in?
  4. What are the temperature and humidity operating conditions for the unit?
  5. What programming functions, if any, does the unit have?

Type of laboratory shakers used by survey respondents:

Vortex shaker 24%
Orbital shaker 18%
Incubator shaker 17%
Rocking shaker 17%
Vibrating shaker 10%
Biological shaker 6%
Reciprocal shaker 5%
Nutating shaker 3%
Other 1%

Number of hours per day shaker is in operation:

Less than 1 hour 25%
1 - 3 hours 26%
3 - 5 hours 11%
5 - 7 hours 9%
> 7 hours 29%

Nearly 27% of respondents plan on purchasing a new laboratory shaker in the next year. The estimated budget ranges for these purchases are as follows:

Less than $500
$500 - $1,000
$1,500 - $3,000
$3,000 - $6,000
$6,000 +
Don't know

Top 10 features/factors respondents look for when purchasing a laboratory shaker:

Durability / Rugged design 67%
Low maintenance / Easy to clean 53%
Shaking speed 46%
Simple operation - Easy to program and monitor 41%
Compact design 33%
Low noise - Quiet 32%
Warranty 28%
Minimal vibration 26%
Heating/cooling capability 26%
Electronic speed controls 24%

For more information on laboratory shakers, including useful articles and a list of manufacturers, visit www.labmanager.com/shakers

See the most recent survey results

Categories: Surveys

Published In

Navigating The Post-Sequestration Landscape Magazine Issue Cover
Navigating The Post-Sequestration Landscape

Published: September 11, 2014

Cover Story

Navigating the Post-Sequestration Landscape

Job satisfaction and morale among researchers relying on government grants were body slammed by the sequestration—at least $1.3 trillion in across-the-board funding cuts were mandated by the 2011 Budget Control Act for 2013 through 2021.

Featured Articles

Cell Culture Reagents and Applications: Focus on 3D Cultures

Geoffrey Bartholomeusz, PhD, associate professor in the Department of Experimental Therapeutics and director of the siRNA Core Facility at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, talks to contributing editor Tanuja Koppal, PhD, about why there is a growing interest in replacing some 2D cell culture applications with 3D cell cultures. He talks about where and why he uses 3D-based cell cultures in his lab and what lab managers should take into consideration before making the investment in this innovative technology.

Perspective On: A Clinical Research Lab

One of the major benefits of working in the sciences is the ability to have a positive impact on the world through research or the development of new products. That’s certainly the case with working at Redbiotec AG, a biotechnology company located at the Bio-Technopark in Schlieren, near Zürich, Switzerland.
We have updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data.
Please read our Cookie Policy to learn how we use cookies to provide you with a better experience.