a female laboratoy technician working at a fume hood illustrating some of the common limitations of fume hoods in modern labs

Common Misuses and Limitations of Fume Hoods

Used appropriately, a fume hood can be a very effective device for containment hazardous materials, as well as providing some protection from splashes and minor explosions. Even so, the average fume hood does have several limitations.

Written byTrevor Henderson, PhD
Updated | 3 min read
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
3:00

Introduction

Fume hoods are critical safety devices in laboratories, designed to protect users from hazardous materials by containing and ventilating harmful substances. However, their effectiveness depends on proper use. Misuse and misunderstanding of their limitations can lead to serious safety hazards, including exposure to toxic substances, fire risks, and ineffective containment. This article explores common misuses and limitations of fume hoods, offering guidance on best practices to ensure safe laboratory operations.

Limitations of Fume Hoods

1. Particulates

Fume hoods are not designed to effectively contain high-velocity particulate contaminants unless the sash is fully closed. If large amounts of particulates are expected, alternative containment methods, such as specialized filtration units, should be used.

Lab manager academy logo

Lab Safety Management Certificate

The Lab Safety Management certificate is more than training—it’s a professional advantage.

Gain critical skills and IACET-approved CEUs that make a measurable difference.

2. Pressurized Systems

Gases or vapors escaping from pressurized systems can move at high velocities, potentially bypassing the hood’s containment capabilities. Additional precautions, such as secondary containment and specialized ventilation, may be necessary.

3. Explosion Containment

A standard fume hood cannot contain explosions, even when the sash is fully closed. If an explosion hazard exists, additional safety measures, such as anchored barriers, shields, or explosion-proof enclosures, should be implemented. However, these barriers may also affect airflow within the hood.

4. Perchloric Acid Use

Standard fume hoods must not be used for perchloric acid. Vapors can settle on ductwork, forming perchlorate crystals, which are highly explosive. Instead, specialized perchloric acid hoods made of stainless steel with a built-in washdown system should be used.

5. Air Foil Sills

Many fume hoods have airfoil sills that direct airflow smoothly across the work surface. Users should avoid removing or modifying these sills and should not place objects on them, as this may disrupt airflow and reduce containment efficiency.

lab design news logo

Interested in lab design?

Sign up for the free Lab Design Newsletter from our sister site, Lab Design News.

Is the form not loading? If you use an ad blocker or browser privacy features, try turning them off and refresh the page.

By completing this form, you agree to receive news updates and relevant promotional content from Lab Design News. You may unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy

6. Spill Containment Lips

Modern fume hoods often have recessed work surfaces or spill containment lips to help contain minor liquid spills. Containers should never be placed on the hood lip, as this increases the risk of spills spreading outside the hood’s containment area.

7. Horizontal Sliding Sashes

Removing horizontal sliding sashes compromises the hood’s containment capability. These sashes are designed to keep the face opening within a safe range. Removing them can reduce face velocity and increase exposure risk.

8. Tubing for Exhaust

Using tubing to channel exhaust from equipment to a fume hood is not an effective control method. The hood’s airflow may not be sufficient to contain the exhaust properly, leading to potential exposure hazards.

9. Connecting Additional Devices to Exhaust Systems

New ventilation devices should not be connected to an existing fume hood without approval from facility management. Modifying an exhaust system can negatively impact the performance of all connected hoods.

10. Microorganism Handling

Fume hoods are not designed for biological work involving harmful microorganisms. Instead, biosafety cabinets should be used to protect both personnel and samples from contamination.

11. Highly Hazardous Substances

While fume hoods effectively contain most contaminants, they may not provide sufficient protection when working with highly toxic substances. Glove boxes offer better containment in such cases.

12. Pollution Control

Fume hoods are not pollution control devices. Unfiltered exhaust releases contaminants directly into the atmosphere. Where necessary, condensers, traps, or scrubbers should be used to minimize environmental impact.

13. Waste Disposal

Fume hoods should not be used for waste disposal. Directing waste chemicals into the exhaust violates environmental regulations and increases exposure risks.

Misuse of Fume Hoods for Storage

Fume hoods are designed for ventilation during chemical manipulations, not as chemical storage units. Storing chemicals inside a fume hood can obstruct airflow and create safety hazards, especially in case of fire or explosion.

Hoods Actively in Use for Experimentation

  • Storage should be minimized or eliminated. Materials inside the hood can interfere with containment and exacerbate hazardous events.
  • Flammable or volatile chemicals pose a significant risk in case of ignition.
  • Stored materials can be spilled during an emergency, worsening the situation.

Hoods Not in Active Use

If a fume hood is not being actively used for experimentation, it may be designated for ventilated storage. However, this should only be done if:

  • Materials are properly segregated to prevent incompatible chemical reactions.
  • Clear signage is posted to indicate the hood is designated for storage and not for active work.

Conclusion

Fume hoods are vital safety tools but must be used correctly to be effective. Understanding their limitations and avoiding common misuses can prevent exposure to hazardous substances, fires, and equipment failures. Researchers should follow best practices and institutional guidelines to maintain a safe and compliant laboratory environment.


This content includes text that has been generated with the assistance of AI. Lab Manager’s AI policy can be found here

About the Author

  • Trevor Henderson headshot

    Trevor Henderson BSc (HK), MSc, PhD (c), has more than two decades of experience in the fields of scientific and technical writing, editing, and creative content creation. With academic training in the areas of human biology, physical anthropology, and community health, he has a broad skill set of both laboratory and analytical skills. Since 2013, he has been working with LabX Media Group developing content solutions that engage and inform scientists and laboratorians. He can be reached at thenderson@labmanager.com.

    View Full Profile

Related Topics

Loading Next Article...
Loading Next Article...

CURRENT ISSUE - May/June 2025

The Benefits, Business Case, And Planning Strategies Behind Lab Digitalization

Joining Processes And Software For a Streamlined, Quality-First Laboratory

Lab Manager May/June 2025 Cover Image