Decline of Natural History Troubling for Science, Society

Support for natural history – the study of organisms, how and where they live and how they interact with their environment – appears to be in steep decline in developed countries, according to Joshua Tewksbury, a University of Washington professor and WWF International scientist.

Written bySandra Hines, University of Washington News Office
| 3 min read
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
3:00

“Yet natural history provides essential knowledge for fields as varied as human health, food security, conservation, land management and recreation,” he said.

Tewksbury and 16 other scientists from across North America outline the importance to society and call for a revitalization of the practice of natural history in an article in the April issue of BioScience.

Natural history is generally more concerned with observations and collections than with experimentation. It’s thought narrowly as the purview of scientists bottling up specimens or pressing plants meant for museums. But natural history is really about looking at organisms so closely that one learns their habits and how they fit with what’s around them. The approach works for understanding animals, plants and other organisms outdoors as well as at the microbial level in, for example, our bodies.

To continue reading this article, sign up for FREE to
Lab Manager Logo
Membership is FREE and provides you with instant access to eNewsletters, digital publications, article archives, and more.

CURRENT ISSUE - October 2025

Turning Safety Principles Into Daily Practice

Move Beyond Policies to Build a Lab Culture Where Safety is Second Nature

Lab Manager October 2025 Cover Image