Researcher using a flask for microfluidic pollutant detection.

New Microfluidic Chip Detects PFAS in Minutes Without Sample Preparation

Trap-based microfluidic device enables rapid PFAS detection from complex samples without filtration steps

Written byMichelle Gaulin
| 2 min read
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00

A newly developed microfluidic pollutant detection platform could reduce sample preparation steps in environmental testing laboratories by enabling direct extraction and detection of contaminants from samples containing solids.

Researchers at the Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology and Chungnam National University have developed a trap-based microfluidic device that detects pollutants, including per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), without filtration or pretreatment, according to a study published in ACS Sensors. The system detected perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) within five minutes and successfully extracted carbamazepine from sand-containing slurry samples before analysis using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

For laboratories conducting environmental monitoring, drinking water testing, or food safety analysis, eliminating multistep preparation could reduce turnaround time, decrease solvent consumption, and improve workflow efficiency. Microfluidic pollutant detection systems use microscale channels to manipulate small fluid volumes, allowing chemical separation and extraction processes to occur more rapidly than traditional liquid–liquid extraction workflows.

How microfluidic pollutant detection technology works

The device uses a trap-based microfluidic configuration that confines an extractant droplet inside a microchamber while the sample flows through an adjacent microchannel. Target analytes transfer selectively into the extractant droplet, while solid particles pass through the channel without interfering with the extraction process.

After extraction, the droplet can be retrieved and analyzed using conventional laboratory instrumentation such as HPLC. This integration of extraction and sample handling into a single platform reduces the need for multiple preparation steps that typically precede instrumental analysis.

Why eliminating pretreatment matters for environmental testing laboratories

Environmental pollutant analysis traditionally involves several workflow stages:

  • Filtration to remove particulates
  • Separation or concentration of analytes
  • Solvent-based extraction
  • Instrumental detection

Each step adds time, cost, and potential variability. Filtration may also unintentionally remove trace-level analytes along with solids, affecting sensitivity and accuracy.

By integrating extraction directly into the analytical device, microfluidic pollutant detection approaches may simplify workflows while maintaining analytical reliability. Reduced preparation steps can also support automation strategies in environmental testing laboratories.

Applications for PFAS detection and laboratory operations

The researchers demonstrated the platform’s ability to detect:

  • Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), a regulated PFAS compound
  • Carbamazepine, a pharmaceutical contaminant

These capabilities suggest potential use across multiple laboratory sectors.

Environmental testing laboratories may benefit from faster turnaround times for water and soil analysis. Public health laboratories could use similar systems for rapid screening of contaminants, while food safety laboratories may apply the technology to complex sample matrices. Research laboratories may also benefit from automation-compatible sample-preparation tools.

Ju Hyeon Kim, PhD, noted that “integrating multiple pretreatment steps into a single process offers substantial advantages for on-site analysis and automated systems.”

Operational implications for lab managers

For laboratory leaders, microfluidic pollutant detection technology highlights broader trends toward workflow consolidation and automation. Integrated extraction platforms may reduce solvent use, decrease manual handling, and enable portable or field-deployable testing approaches.

Although additional validation and commercialization steps will likely be required, the approach demonstrates how microfluidic systems can serve as alternatives to traditional extraction methods, particularly for laboratories processing large numbers of environmental samples or complex matrices.

This article was created with the assistance of Generative AI and has undergone editorial review before publishing.

Add Lab Manager as a preferred source on Google

Add Lab Manager as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

About the Author

  • Headshot photo of Michelle Gaulin

    Michelle Gaulin is an associate editor for Lab Manager. She holds a bachelor of journalism degree from Toronto Metropolitan University in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and has two decades of experience in editorial writing, content creation, and brand storytelling. In her role, she contributes to the production of the magazine’s print and online content, collaborates with industry experts, and works closely with freelance writers to deliver high-quality, engaging material.

    Her professional background spans multiple industries, including automotive, travel, finance, publishing, and technology. She specializes in simplifying complex topics and crafting compelling narratives that connect with both B2B and B2C audiences.

    In her spare time, Michelle enjoys outdoor activities and cherishes time with her daughter. She can be reached at mgaulin@labmanager.com.

    View Full Profile

Related Topics

Loading Next Article...
Loading Next Article...

CURRENT ISSUE - January/February 2026

How to Build Trust Into Every Lab Result

Applying the Six Cs Helps Labs Deliver Results Stakeholders Can Rely On

Lab Manager January/February 2026 Cover Image