Research Shows Need to Regulate Antimicrobial Products

Does the widespread and still proliferating use of antimicrobial household products cause more harm than good to consumers and the environment? Evidence compiled in a new feature article published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) by Arizona State University professor Rolf Halden shows that decades of widespread use of antimicrobials has left consumers with no measurable benefits.

Written byArizona State University
| 4 min read
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
4:00

Worse yet, lax regulation has caused widespread contamination of the environment, wildlife and human populations with compounds that appear more toxic than safe, according to recent scientific research.

After 40 years of unfinished business, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has revisited the issue regarding the safety of some of the most common antibacterial additives of household products; chemicals called triclocarban (TCC) and triclosan (TCS), used in soaps and toothpaste.

"It's a big deal that the FDA is taking this on," said Rolf Halden, who has been tracking the issue for years. Halden is the director of the Center for Environmental Security, a joint research hub created with support from ASU's Biodesign Institute, the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering and the Security and Defense Systems Initiative.

The FDA has given soap manufacturers one year to demonstrate that the substances are safe, or to take them out of the products altogether. The FDA rule is open for public comment until June.

To continue reading this article, sign up for FREE to
Lab Manager Logo
Membership is FREE and provides you with instant access to eNewsletters, digital publications, article archives, and more.

CURRENT ISSUE - October 2025

Turning Safety Principles Into Daily Practice

Move Beyond Policies to Build a Lab Culture Where Safety is Second Nature

Lab Manager October 2025 Cover Image