Lab leadership development with team discussion in laboratory setting.

Study Finds Leadership Capability Declines as Workplace Complexity Grows

New data on leadership capability highlights gaps with implications for scientific and technical teams

Written byMichelle Gaulin
| 2 min read
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00

Lab leadership development is becoming more critical as organizations face rapid technological change, workforce pressures, and continual transformation. McLean and Company’s HR Trends 2026 report highlights a steady decline in leadership capability—even as leaders confront expanding responsibilities and heightened expectations. These findings hold particular relevance for scientific and technical environments, where strong people-management skills in labs directly influence accuracy, collaboration, and long-term innovation.

Lab leadership development linked to stronger innovation outcomes

A key finding in the report is the strong relationship between effective people management and organizational innovation. Leaders who demonstrate strong people-management skills are 2.3 times more likely to support high-performing innovation cultures. Despite this connection, only 35 percent of HR teams report being high-performing in developing leaders.

This gap underscores the need for intentional lab leadership development. Scientific teams rely on leaders who can guide complex work, communicate expectations clearly, and foster the psychological safety needed for new ideas to surface. Without these capabilities, teams may hesitate to ask questions, raise concerns, or propose improvements—behaviors essential to research integrity and operational reliability.

People-management skills in labs shape team resilience

The report highlights that leadership capability is declining at the same time as workplace demands are increasing. Leaders are managing digital transformation, shifting workflows, talent shortages, and cultural expectations, often without dedicated support. In scientific settings, these pressures compound existing responsibilities, including quality oversight, documentation requirements, and safety leadership.

People-management skills in labs influence whether teams feel supported during change, whether expectations are realistic, and whether early signs of overload or confusion are addressed. Leaders who lack these skills may unintentionally contribute to escalating stress levels or communication breakdowns, affecting both morale and performance.

Scientific leadership capability depends on behavior, not just expertise

While scientific expertise is essential, the report emphasizes that technical skills alone do not drive effective leadership. Leaders must also model behavior that aligns with organizational values, promotes accountability, and reinforces cultural norms. Fewer than half of organizations hold leaders accountable for consistently living those values.

Scientific leadership capability requires balancing subject-matter knowledge with interpersonal competence. Laboratory teams closely observe leaders’ actions, especially in areas such as safety culture, quality practices, and conflict resolution. When behavior and expectations are aligned, teams are more likely to maintain high standards and engage openly in problem-solving.

Implications for strengthening lab leadership development

The HR Trends 2026 findings point to several opportunities for organizations to support stronger leadership across scientific teams:

  • Integrate people-management skills in labs into leadership training, focusing on communication, coaching, and decision-making
  • Define scientific leadership capability expectations clearly, linking them to performance evaluations and career progression
  • Ensure leaders receive structured support during periods of great change so they can respond effectively to team needs
  • Encourage behavior-based accountability rather than measuring performance solely by output or project completion
  • Create regular feedback channels to help leaders understand how their actions affect team culture and performance

Strengthening lab leadership development equips teams to navigate complex workloads, adopt new technologies more successfully, and sustain innovation through periods of uncertainty. Building capable, people-centered leaders is no longer optional—it is a strategic requirement for organizational resilience.

This article was created with the assistance of Generative AI and has undergone editorial review before publishing.

About the Author

  • Headshot photo of Michelle Gaulin

    Michelle Gaulin is an associate editor for Lab Manager. She holds a bachelor of journalism degree from Toronto Metropolitan University in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and has two decades of experience in editorial writing, content creation, and brand storytelling. In her role, she contributes to the production of the magazine’s print and online content, collaborates with industry experts, and works closely with freelance writers to deliver high-quality, engaging material.

    Her professional background spans multiple industries, including automotive, travel, finance, publishing, and technology. She specializes in simplifying complex topics and crafting compelling narratives that connect with both B2B and B2C audiences.

    In her spare time, Michelle enjoys outdoor activities and cherishes time with her daughter. She can be reached at mgaulin@labmanager.com.

    View Full Profile

Related Topics

Loading Next Article...
Loading Next Article...

CURRENT ISSUE - November/December 2025

AI & Automation

Preparing Your Lab for the Next Stage

Lab Manager Nov/Dec 2025 Cover Image