Research team points out how bureaucratic inefficiency can be likened to that of the peer-review process associated with academic research in the health sciences
The researchers emphasize that, with billions of dollars at stake, additional research is needed on this vital system of funding and any potential improvements to the process
In a one-of-a-kind funding program designed to spark innovative research without traditional peer review, University of Michigan professors spun their MCubed seed money into millions more.
A fresh pair of eyes can often bring a different or new perspective, especially when it comes to science and research.
We’ve updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data. Please read our Cookie Policy to learn how we use cookies to provide you with a better experience.