Laboratory staff demonstrating engagement and morale at work

Life Science Employee Engagement Surges Despite Global Burnout Crisis

New CRB data show how mission-driven work, AI, and thoughtful lab design sustain morale

Written byMichelle Gaulin
| 2 min read
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00

In a year when many industries are battling burnout and turnover, the life sciences sector is showing remarkable resilience. According to CRB’s Horizons: Life Sciences 2025 Report, 73 percent of life science professionals say they are happy or very happy at work—a rate more than triple the global average.

The report, based on responses from more than 400 R&D and manufacturing professionals, attributes this satisfaction to meaningful work and autonomy. Scientists and technicians say their motivation comes from advancing patient outcomes, solving complex challenges, and developing transformative technologies that improve lives.

By contrast, Gallup’s State of the Global Workplace 2025 report found that only 21 percent of workers worldwide feel engaged, while leadership consultancy DDI reported an increase in stress among managers, citing a lack of trust and insufficient time to lead effectively. Against that backdrop, CRB’s findings reveal how purpose and well-designed workplaces can offset the pressures affecting other industries.

Human-centered laboratory workplace design supports staff morale

Laboratory and manufacturing roles rarely allow remote or hybrid work, yet CRB’s survey shows high morale across these hands-on environments. The reason, according to respondents, lies in human-centered workplace design and culture.

Organizations are rethinking engagement by prioritizing:

  • Wellness programs and mental health resources integrated into daily operations
  • Flexible scheduling to balance demanding lab shifts with recovery time
  • Thoughtful laboratory design featuring natural light, quiet zones, and rest areas

These design choices signal that well-being and productivity are equally valued. As a result, life science employee engagement remains high even without the flexibility of remote work.

AI tools improve employee satisfaction in life sciences

The Horizons report also highlights a positive shift in how labs use technology. Leading life science organizations are leveraging artificial intelligence to reduce administrative burden, not to monitor performance.

By automating documentation, inventory management, and scheduling, AI systems free scientists to focus on research, innovation, and collaboration—the work they find most fulfilling. This approach strengthens trust, promotes autonomy, and directly supports higher employee satisfaction across laboratories.

Mission-driven culture strengthens scientific workforce retention

Despite economic headwinds and regulatory challenges, CRB’s data show a workforce that remains both resilient and motivated. Analysts describe the sector as a “mission-driven workforce powering it all,” united by a shared commitment to improving patient outcomes.

That shared mission—combined with supportive design and technological enablement—appears to be the strongest safeguard against disengagement. When employees understand the real-world impact of their work, they stay energized, focused, and loyal.

How lab managers can apply these employee engagement insights

For laboratory managers, the findings underscore a critical takeaway: employee engagement can thrive without remote work when mission, autonomy, and environment align.

Reducing administrative friction, investing in ergonomic and restorative workspaces, and reinforcing the lab’s contribution to public health can all strengthen morale and retention. As CRB’s data demonstrate, life science employee engagement grows when people feel trusted, supported, and connected to the purpose behind the science.

This article was created with the assistance of Generative AI and has undergone editorial review before publishing.

About the Author

  • Headshot photo of Michelle Gaulin

    Michelle Gaulin is an associate editor for Lab Manager. She holds a bachelor of journalism degree from Toronto Metropolitan University in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and has two decades of experience in editorial writing, content creation, and brand storytelling. In her role, she contributes to the production of the magazine’s print and online content, collaborates with industry experts, and works closely with freelance writers to deliver high-quality, engaging material.

    Her professional background spans multiple industries, including automotive, travel, finance, publishing, and technology. She specializes in simplifying complex topics and crafting compelling narratives that connect with both B2B and B2C audiences.

    In her spare time, Michelle enjoys outdoor activities and cherishes time with her daughter. She can be reached at mgaulin@labmanager.com.

    View Full Profile

Related Topics

Loading Next Article...
Loading Next Article...

CURRENT ISSUE - October 2025

Turning Safety Principles Into Daily Practice

Move Beyond Policies to Build a Lab Culture Where Safety is Second Nature

Lab Manager October 2025 Cover Image